Subject	here's my 3" round
Posted by	sbsTT(MD) on September 11, 2002 at 7:48 AM
	This message has been viewed 151 times.
In Reply To	Any noticable sound difference in 3" Round vs. 4" Oval B&B? posted by SeedyRom (Boosted!) on September 11, 2002 at 02:28 AM
Message	Zee Ya, Spencer AIM: sbsTT14 '91 300ZX TT Stage III+ '88 Chevy S-10 Blazer THAT'S NOT ME!!!===>THAT IS!====> "I felt like I was rear-ended by a highspeed train when I ran the car on high boost first time. Crazy...just crazy...." - timz 18:18:31 09/08/02
Follow Ups	Any noticable sound difference in 3" Round vs. 4" Oval B&B? - SeedyRom (Boosted!) 02:28:20 09/11/02 Ill go take some pics right now (kinda dark out tho. BRB (n/m) - Snoguitar [ABCDEFG] 02:38:04 09/11/02 Here you go... - Snoguitar [ABCDEFG] 02:51:21 09/11/02 They look identical to the 3" just the tip. Easy. - SeedyRom (Boosted!) 03:35:00 09/11/02 Side by side the 4.5 oval looks much better/meaner - Snoguitar [ABCDEFG] 03:39:33 09/11/02 Yeah, I know...I wanted the 4" Oval originall... - SeedyRom (Boosted!) 03:41:14 09/11/02 What i dont like about the rounds is... - Snoguitar [ABCDEFG] 03:44:11 09/11/02 agree, quad oval makes it look like factory fit/installed - FLY 1 (Dallaz) 04:06:12 09/11/02 this is important to me as well but i got a question... - RaditZ 05:17:24 09/11/02 heres what happened... - Snoguitar [ABCDEFG] 05:50:18 09/11/02 old Ovals(retagular-ish), rounds, and new ovals= () - FLY 1 (Dallaz) 06:04:05 09/11/02 oooooh ok that explains it a lot more thx hehe (n/m) - RaditZ 15:19:14 09/11/02 get the 3" it's a bit more "sleeperish" :-) (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 07:50:34 09/11/02 Only if you are in a coma :-) (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 10:34:15 09/11/02 there should be no difference - FLY 1 (Dallaz) 04:03:57 09/11/02 I have different tips on stock muffler and >>> - Snuffy 05:06:10 09/11/02 i've seen kaminari fit, actually look much sleeker than WW (n/m) - Jjzx [NCSMB] 05:32:43 09/11/02 Just go ahead and freakin buy one already - U ZCREAM (Gainesville) 04:54:03 09/11/02 driven in and next to both and no difference - gtclk 05:00:44 09/11/02 ok jackie. =\ (n/m) - Halo Z 05:02:28 09/11/02 Bite me. - SeedyRom (Boosted!) 10:36:53 09/11/02 driven in and next to both and no difference - gtclk 05:10:21 09/11/02 no difference in sound (n/m) - lymon 05:53:27 09/11/02 got more - sorry, dial up - FLY 1 (Dallaz) 06:31:39 09/11/02 Wow. (n/m) - SeedyRom (Boosted!) 10:39:52 09/11/02 Here is a pic of my B&B SS 2.5" Exhaust single oval 4.5" tip - TARGETZ 07:46:45 09/11/02 single tip B&B sucks hockey pucks. - sbsTT(MD) 07:57:29 09/11/02 Single tip owns you. As does gutted pre-cats. (n/m) - TTony 09:11:38 09/11/02 Bah. And will be rectified soon (I hope) (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 09:13:03 09/11/02 No job + screwdriver + wrench = gutted pre-cats. No excuses! (n/m) - TTony 09:15:08 09/11/02 all that = wasted time and effort... - sbsTT(MD) 10:06:59 09/11/02 uhhh... you said that a few months ago. (n/m) - TTony 10:25:09 09/11/02 that was before I lost my job :( (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 10:37:02 09/11/02 :-( (n/m) - TTony 11:38:38 09/11/02 thats the only view you will get of my Z... - TARGETZ 10:05:50 09/11/02 I don't think so. You're Stage IV+ Z... - sbsTT(MD) 10:09:37 09/11/02 rofl :-) (n/m) - TARGETZ 10:15:05 09/11/02 e-mail? (n/m) - TTony 11:39:36 09/11/02 Target, did you get my e-mail? (n/m) - TTony 09:13:23 09/11/02 here's my 3" round - sbsTT(MD) 07:48:15 09/11/02 thats stock (n/m) - genic 09:00:11 09/11/02 to the untrained eye, yes it is :) - sbsTT(MD) 09:12:07 09/11/02 is that what you thought when you traded your Z in? (n/m) - TTony 09:14:14 09/11/02 until i heard it drive away :( (n/m) - genic 10:56:11 09/11/02 Hello old friends=) (n/m) - -Ever- 09:34:02 09/11/02 :-) (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 10:10:48 09/11/02 look at ya showing up that 944...... (n/m) - RaditZ 15:21:23 09/11/02 thats was my boss' 944T. - sbsTT(MD) 16:52:50 09/11/02 hehe turbo s' are very good 944s (n/m) - RaditZ 22:00:46 09/11/02 Quad Ovals is the only way to fly IMHO, but the sound is - YugoBernie (NoVA) 10:31:30 09/11/02 I've heard the 3" round. Sound the exact same as 4" - Mike (La Canada) 10:57:39 09/11/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.